______________________________________
"Characteristics"
1831
The Edinburgh Review
(Edinburgh, . Vol. LIV. December, 1831)
______________________________________
Back
[Note on electronic version: This article was published
originally in the Edinburgh Review in 1831. This electronic version
is taken from Charles W. Eliot, 1909, editor, The Harvard
Classics: Volume 25, New York: Collier, pp.333-71. Also available online at Biblio Bytes.
Pagination too frequent, so excluded. Section numbering adjusted to
"double-line" breaks in the original. All errors are otherwise left intact.
As far as we know, this essay is in the public domain. You are free to make use of this electronic
version in any way you wish, except for commercial purposes, without asking
permission. All comments and corrections of this text are encouraged and can be
addressed to HET contact]
Characteristics
I.
The healthy know not of their health, but only the sick: this is the Physician's
Aphorism; and applicable in a far wider sense than he gives it. We may say, it
holds no less in moral, intellectual, political, poetical, than in merely corporeal
therapeutics; that wherever, or in what shape soever, powers of the sort
which can be named vital are at work, herein lies the test of their working right
or working wrong.
In the Body, for example, as all doctors are agreed, the first condition of
complete health is, that each organ perform its function, unconsciously,
unheeded; let but any organ announce its separate existence, were it even
boastfully, and for pleasure, not for pain, then already has one of those
unfortunate 'false centres of sensibility' established itself, already is
derangement there. The perfection of bodily well-being is that the collective
bodily activities seem one; and be manifested, moreover, not in themselves,
but in the action they accomplish. If a Dr. Kitchiner boast that his system is in
high order, Dietetic Philosophy may indeed take credit; but the true Peptician
was that Countryman who answered that, 'for his part, he had no system.' [1]
In
fact, unity, agreement is always silent, or soft-voiced; it is only discord that
loudly proclaims itself. So long as the several elements of Life, all fitly
adjusted, can pour forth their movement like harmonious tuned strings, it is a
melody and unison; Life, from its mysterious fountains, flows out as in celestial
music and diapason, - which also, like that other music of the spheres, even
because it is perennial and complete, without interruption and without
imperfection, might be fabled to escape the ear. Thus too, in some languages,
is the state of health well denoted by a term expressing unity; when we feel
ourselves as we wish to be, we say that we are whole.
Few mortals, it is to be feared, are permanently blessed with that felicity of
'having no system'; nevertheless, most of us, looking back on young years,
may remember seasons of a light, aërial translucency and elasticity and perfect
freedom; the body had not yet become the prison-house of the soul, but was
its vehicle and implement, like a creature of the thought, and altogether pliant
to its bidding. We knew not that we had limbs, we only lifted, hurled and
leapt; through eye and ear, and all avenues of sense, came clear unimpeded
tidings from without, and from within issued clear victorious force; we stood
as in the centre of Nature, giving and receiving, in harmony with it all; unlike
Virgil's Husbandmen, 'too happy because we did not know our blessedness.'
In those days, health and sickness were foreign traditions that did not concern
us; our whole being was as yet One, the whole man like an incorporated Will.
Such, were Rest or ever-successful Labour the human lot, might our life
continue to be: a pure, perpetual, unregarded music; a beam of perfect white
light, rendering all things visible, but itself unseen, even because it was of that
perfect whiteness, and no irregular obstruction had yet broken it into colours.
The beginning of Inquiry is Disease: all Science, if we consider well, as it must
have originated in the feeling of something being wrong, so it is and continues
to be but Division, Dismemberment, and partial healing of the wrong. Thus, as
was of old written, the Tree of Knowledge springs from a root of evil, and
bears fruits of good and evil. Had Adam remained in Paradise, there had been
no Anatomy and no Metaphysics.
But, alas, as the Philosopher declares, 'Life itself is a disease; a working
incited by suffering'; action from passion! The memory of that first state of
Freedom and paradisaic Unconsciousness has faded away into an ideal poetic
dream. We stand here too conscious of many things: with Knowledge, the
symptom of Derangement, we must even do our best to restore a little Order.
Life is, in few instances, and at rare intervals, the diapason of a heavenly
melody; oftenest the fierce jar of disruptions and convulsions, which, do what
we will, there is no disregarding. Nevertheless, such is still the wish of Nature
on our behalf; in all vital action, her manifest purpose and effort is, that we
should be unconscious of it, and like the peptic Countryman, never know that
we 'have a system.' For, indeed vital action everywhere is emphatically a
means, not an end; Life is not given us for the mere sake of Living, but always
with an ulterior external Aim: neither is it on the process, on the means, but
rather on the result, that Nature, is any of her doings, is wont to intrust us with
insight and volition. Boundless as is the domain of man, it is but a small
fractional proportion of it that he rules with Consciousness and by
Forethought: what he can contrive, nay, what he can altogether know and
comprehend, is essentially the mechanical, small; the great is ever, in one
sense or other, the vital; it is essentially the mysterious, and only the surface of
it can be understood. But Nature, it might seem, strives, like a kind mother, to
hide from us even this, that she is a mystery: she will have us rest on her
beautiful and awful bosom as if it were our secure home; on the bottomless
boundless Deep, whereon all human things fearfully and wonderfully swim,
she will have us walk and build, as if the film which supported us there (which
any scratch of a bare bodkin will rend asunder, any sputter of a pistol-shot
instantaneously burn up) were no film, but a solid rock-foundation. Forever in
the neighbourhood of an inevitable Death, man can forget that he is born to
die; of his Life, which, strictly meditated, contains in it an Immensity and an
Eternity, he can conceive lightly, as of a simple implement wherewith to do
day-labour and earn wages. So cunningly does Nature, the mother of all
highest Art, which only apes her from afar, 'body forth the Finite from the
Infinite'; and guide man safe on his wondrous path, not more by endowing him
with vision, than, at the right place, with blindness! Under all her works,
chiefly under her noblest work, Life, lies a basis of Darkness, which she
benignantly conceals; in Life too, the roots and inward circulations which
stretch down fearfully to the regions of Death and Night, shall not hint of their
existence, and only the fair stem with its leaves and flowers, shone on by the
fair sun, shall disclose itself, and joyfully grow.
However, without venturing into the abstruse, or too eagerly asking Why and
How, in things where our answer must needs prove, in great part, an echo of
the question, let us be content to remark farther, in the merely historical way,
how that Aphorism of the bodily Physician holds good in quite other
departments. Of the Soul, with her activities, we shall find it no less true than
of the Body: nay, cry the Spiritualists, is not that very division of the unity,
Man, into a dualism of Soul and Body, itself the symptom of disease; as,
perhaps, your frightful theory of Materialism, of his being but a Body, and
therefore, at least, once more a unity, may be the paroxysm which was
critical, and the beginning of cure! But omitting this, we observe, with
confidence enough, that the truly strong mind, view it as Intellect, as Morality,
or under any other aspect, is nowise the mind acquainted with its strength; that
here as before the sign of health is Unconsciousness. In our inward, as in our
outward world, what is mechanical lies open to us: not what is dynamical and
has vitality. Of our Thinking, we might say, it is but the mere upper surface
that we shape into articulate Thoughts; - underneath the region of argument
and conscious discourse, lies the region of meditation; here, in its quiet
mysterious depths, dwells what vital force is in us; here, if aught is to be
created, and not merely manufactured and communicated, must the work go
on. Manufacture is intelligible, but trivial: Creation is great, and cannot be
understood. Thus if the Debater and Demonstrator, whom we may rank as
the lowest of true thinkers, knows what he has done, and how he did it, the
Artist, whom we rank as the highest, knows not; must speak of Inspiration,
and in one or the other dialect, call his work the gift of a divinity.
But on the whole, 'genius is ever a secret to itself'; of this old truth we have,
on all sides, daily evidence. The Shakspeare takes no airs for writing Hamlet
and the Tempest, understands not that it is anything surprising: Milton, again,
is more conscious of his faculty, which accordingly is an inferior one. On the
other hand, what cackling and strutting must we not often hear and see, when,
in some shape of academical prolusion, maiden speech, review article, this or
the other well-fledged goose has produced its goose-egg, of quite measurable
value, were it the pink of its whole kind; and wonders why all mortals do not
wonder!
Foolish enough, too, was the College Tutor's surprise at Walter Shandy: how,
though unread in Aristotle, he could nevertheless argue; and not knowing the
name of any dialectic tool, handled them all to perfection. Is it the skilfulest
anatomist that cuts the best figure at Sadler's Wells? or does the boxer hit
better for knowing that he has a flexor longus and a flexor brevis? But indeed,
as in the higher case of the Poet, so here in that of the Speaker and Inquirer,
the true force is an unconscious one. The healthy Understanding, we should
say, is not the Logical, argumentative, but the Intuitive; for the end of
Understanding is not to prove and find reasons, but to know and believe. Of
logic, and its limits, and uses and abuses, there were much to be said and
examined; one fact, however, which chiefly concerns us here, has long been
familiar: that the man of logic and the man of insight; the Reasoner and the
Discoverer, or even Knower, are quite separable, - indeed, for most part,
quite separate characters. In practical matters, for example, has it not become
almost proverbial that the man of logic cannot prosper? This is he whom
business-people call Systematic and Theoriser and Word-monger; his vital
intellectual force lies dormant or extinct, his whole force is mechanical,
conscious: of such a one it is foreseen that, when once confronted with the
infinite complexities of the real world, his little compact theorem of the world
will be found wanting; that unless he can throw it overboard and become a
new creature, he will necessarily founder. Nay, in mere Speculation itself, the
most ineffectual of all characters, generally speaking, is your dialectic
man-at-arms; were he armed cap-a-pie in syllogistic mail of proof, and
perfect master of logic-fence, how little does it avail him! Consider the old
Schoolmen, and their pilgrimage towards Truth: the faithfulest endeavour,
incessant unwearied motion, often great natural vigour: only no progress:
nothing but antic feats of one limb poised against the other; there they
balanced, somersetted, and made postures; at best gyrated swiftly with some
pleasure, like Spinning Dervishes, and ended where they began. So is it, so
will it always be, with all System-makers and builders of logical card-castles;
of which class a certain remnant must, in every age, as they do in our own,
survive and build. Logic is good, but it is not the best. The Irrefragable
Doctor, with his chains of induction, his corollaries, dilemmas and other
cunning logical diagrams and apparatus, will cast you a beautiful horoscope,
and speak reasonable things; nevertheless your stolen jewel, which you
wanted him to find you, is not forthcoming. Often by some winged word,
winged as the thunderbolt is, of a Luther, a Napoleon, a Goethe, shall we see
the difficulty split asunder, and its secret laid bare; while the Irrefragable, with
all his logical tools, hews at it, and hovers round it, and finds it on all hands
too hard for him.
Again, in the difference between Oratory and Rhetoric, as indeed everywhere
in that superiority of what is called the Natural over the Artificial, we find a
similar illustration. The Orator persuades and carries all with him, he knows
not how; the Rhetorician can prove that he ought to have persuaded and
carried all with him: the one is in a state of healthy unconsciousness, as if he
'had no system'; the other, in virtue of regimen and dietetic punctuality, feels at
best that 'his system is in high order.' So stands it, in short, with all the forms
of Intellect, whether as directed to the finding of truth, or to the fit imparting
thereof; to Poetry, to Eloquence, to depth of Insight, which is the basis of
both these; always the characteristic of right performance is a certain
spontaneity, an unconsciousness; 'the healthy know not of their health, but
only the sick.' So that the old precept of the critic, as crabbed as it looked to
his ambitious disciple, might contain in it a most fundamental truth, applicable
to us all, and in much else than Literature: "Whenever you have written any
sentence that looks particularly excellent, be sure to blot it out." In like
manner, under milder phraseology, and with a meaning purposely much wider,
a living Thinker has taught us: 'Of the Wrong we are always conscious, of the
Right never.'
But if such is the law with regard to Speculation and the Intellectual power of
man, much more is it with regard to Conduct, and the power, manifested
chiefly therein, which we name Moral. 'Let not thy left hand know what thy
right hand doeth'; whisper not to thy own heart, How worthy is this action! -
for then it is already becoming worthless. The good man is he who works
continually in welldoing; to whom welldoing is as his natural existence,
awakening no astonishment, requiring no commentary; but there, like a thing
of course, and as if it could not but be so. Self-contemplation, on the other
hand, is infallibly the symptom of disease, be it or be it not the sign of cure. An
unhealthy Virtue is one that consumes itself to leanness in repenting and
anxiety; or, still worse, that inflates itself into dropsical boastfulness and
vain-glory: either way, there is a self-seeking; an unprofitable looking behind
us to measure the way we have made: whereas the sole concern is to walk
continually forward, and make more way. If in any sphere of man's life, then in
the Moral sphere, as the inmost and most vital of all, it is good that there be
wholeness; that there be unconsciousness, which is the evidence of this. Let
the free, reasonable Will, which dwells in us, as in our Holy of Holies, be
indeed free, and obeyed like a Divinity, as is its right and its effort: the perfect
obedience will be the silent one. Such perhaps were the sense of that maxim,
enunciating, as is usual, but the half of a truth: To say that we have a clear
conscience, is to utter a solecism; had we never sinned, we should have had
no conscience. Were defeat unknown, neither would victory be celebrated by
songs of triumph.
This, true enough, is an ideal, impossible state of being; yet ever the goal
towards which our actual state of being strives; which it is the more perfect
the nearer it can approach. Nor, in our actual world, where Labour must
often prove ineffectual, and thus in all senses Light alternate with Darkness,
and the nature of an ideal Morality be much modified, is the case, thus far,
materially different. It is a fact which escapes no one, that, generally speaking,
whoso is acquainted with his worth has but a little stock to cultivate
acquaintance with. Above all, the public acknowledgment of such
acquaintance, indicating that it has reached quite an intimate footing, bodes ill.
Already, to the popular judgment, he who talks much about Virtue in the
abstract, begins to be suspect; it is shrewdly guessed that where there is great
preaching, there will be little alms-giving. Or again, on a wider scale, we can
remark that ages of Heroism are not ages of Moral Philosophy; Virtue, when
it can be philosophised of, has become aware of itself, is sickly and beginning
to decline. A spontaneous habitual all-pervading spirit of Chivalrous Valour
shrinks together, and perks itself up into shrivelled Points of Honour; humane
Courtesy and Nobleness of mind dwindle into punctilious Politeness, 'avoiding
meats'; 'paying tithe of mint and anise, neglecting the weightier matters of the
law.' Goodness, which was a rule to itself, must now appeal to Precept, and
seek strength from Sanctions; the Freewill no longer reigns unquestioned and
by divine right, but like a mere earthly sovereign, by expediency, by Rewards
and Punishments: or rather, let us say, the Freewill, so far as may be, has
abdicated and withdrawn into the dark, and a spectral nightmare of a
Necessity usurps its throne; for now that mysterious Self-impulse of the whole
man, heaven-inspired, and in all senses partaking of the Infinite, being
captiously questioned in a finite dialect, and answering, as it needs must, by
silence, - is conceived as non-extant, and only the outward Mechanism of it
remains acknowledged: of Volition, except as the synonym of Desire, we hear
nothing; of 'Motives,' without any Mover, more than enough.
So too, when the generous Affections have become well-nigh paralytic, we
have the reign of Sentimentality. The greatness, the profitableness, at any rate
the extremely ornamental nature of high feeling, and the luxury of doing good;
charity, love, self-forgetfulness, devotedness and all manner of godlike
magnanimity, - are everywhere insisted on, and pressingly inculcated in
speech and writing, in prose and verse; Socinian Preachers proclaim
'Benevolence' to all the four winds, and have TRUTH engraved on their
watch-seals: unhappily with little or no effect. Were the limbs in right walking
order, why so much demonstrating of motion? The barrenest of all mortals is
the Sentimentalist. Granting even that he were sincere, and did not wilfully
deceive us, or without first deceiving himself, what good is in him? Does he
not lie there as a perpetual lesson of despair, and type of bedrid valetudinarian
impotence? His is emphatically a Virtue that has become, through every fibre,
conscious of itself; it is all sick, and feels as if it were made of glass, and durst
not touch or be touched; in the shape of work, it can do nothing; at the
utmost, by incessant nursing and caudling, keep itself alive. As the last stage of
all, when Virtue, properly so called, has ceased to be practised, and become
extinct, and a mere remembrance, we have the era of Sophists, descanting of
its existence, proving it, denying it, mechanically 'accounting' for it; - as
dissectors and demonstrators cannot operate till once the body be dead.
Thus is true Moral genius, like true Intellectual, which indeed is but a lower
phasis thereof, 'ever a secret to itself.' The healthy moral nature loves
Goodness, and without wonder wholly lives in it: the unhealthy makes love to
it, and would fain get to live in it; or, finding such courtship fruitless, turns
round, and not without contempt abandons it. These curious relations of the
Voluntary and Conscious to the Involuntary and Unconscious, and the small
proportion which, in all departments of our life, the former bears of the latter,
- might lead us into deep questions of Psychology and Physiology: such,
however, belong not to our present object. Enough, if the fact itself become
apparent, that Nature so meant it with us; that in this wise we are made. We
may now say, that view man's individual Existence under what aspect we will,
under the highest spiritual, as under the merely animal aspect, everywhere the
grand vital energy, while in its sound state, is an unseen unconscious one; or,
in the words of our old Aphorism, 'the healthy know not of their health, but
only the sick.'
II.
To understand man, however, we must look beyond the individual man and
his actions or interests, and view him in combination with his fellows. It is in
Society that man first feels what he is; first becomes what he can be. In
Society an altogether new set of spiritual activities are evolved in him, and the
old immeasurably quickened and strengthened. Society is the genial element
wherein his nature first lives and grows; the solitary man were but a small
portion of himself, and must continue forever folded in, stunted and only half
alive. 'Already,' says a deep Thinker, with more meaning than will disclose
itself at once, 'my opinion, my conviction, gains infinitely in strength and
sureness, the moment a second mind has adopted it.' Such, even in its
simplest form, is association; so wondrous the communion of soul with soul as
directed to the mere act of Knowing! In other higher acts, the wonder is still
more manifest; as in that portion of our being which we name the Moral: for
properly, indeed, all communion is of a moral sort, whereof such intellectual
communion (in the act of knowing) is itself an example. But with regard to
Morals strictly so called, it is in Society, we might almost say, that Morality
begins; here at least it takes an altogether new form, and on every side, as in
living growth, expands itself. The Duties of Man to himself, to what is Highest
in himself, make but the First Table of the Law: to the First Table is now
super-added a Second, with the Duties of Man to his Neighbour; whereby
also the significance of the First now assumes its true importance. Man has
joined himself with man; soul acts and reacts on soul; a mystic miraculous
unfathomable Union establishes itself; Life, in all its elements, has become
intensated, consecrated. The lightning-spark of Thought, generated, or say
rather heaven-kindled, in the solitary mind, awakens its express likeness in
another mind, in a thousand other minds, and all blaze-up together in
combined fire; reverberated from mind to mind, fed also with fresh fuel in
each, it acquires incalculable new light as Thought, incalculable new heat as
converted into Action. By and by, a common store of Thought can
accumulate, and be transmitted as an everlasting possession: Literature,
whether as preserved in the memory of Bards, in Runes and Hieroglyphs
engraved on stone, or in Books of written or printed paper, comes into
existence, and begins to play its wondrous part. Polities are formed; the weak
submitting to the strong; with a willing loyalty giving obedience that he may
receive guidance: or say rather, in honour of our nature, the ignorant
submitting to the wise; for so it is in all even the rudest communities, man
never yields himself wholly to brute Force, but always to moral Greatness,
thus the universal title of respect, from the Original Sheik, from the Sachem of
the Red Indians, down to our English Sir, implies only that he whom we mean
to honour is our senior. Last, as the crown and all-supporting keystone of the
fabric, Religion arises. The devout meditation of the isolated man, which flitted
through his soul, like a transient tone of Love and Awe from unknown lands,
acquires certainty, continuance, when it is shared - in by his brother men.
'Where two or three are gathered together' in the name of the Highest, then
first does the Highest, as it is written, 'appear among them to bless them'; then
first does an Altar and act of united Worship open a way from Earth to
Heaven; whereon, were it but a simple Jacob's-ladder, the heavenly
Messengers will travel, with glad tidings and unspeakable gifts for men. Such
is SOCIETY, the vital articulation of many individuals into a new collective
individual: greatly the most important of man's attainments on this earth; that in
which, and by virtue of which, all his other attainments and attempts find their
arena, and have their value. Considered well, Society is the standing wonder
of our existence; a true region of the Supernatural; as it were, a second
all-embracing Life, wherein our first individual Life becomes doubly and trebly
alive, and whatever of Infinitude was in us bodies itself forth, and becomes
visible and active.
To figure Society as endowed with life is scarcely a metaphor; but rather the
statement of a fact by such imperfect methods as language affords. Look at it
closely, that mystic Union, Nature's highest work with man, wherein man's
volition plays an indispensable yet so subordinate a part, and the small
Mechanical grows so mysteriously and indissolubly out of the infinite
Dynamical, like Body out of Spirit, - is truly enough vital, what we can call
vital, and bears the distinguishing character of life. In the same style also, we
can say that Society has its periods of sickness and vigour, of youth,
manhood, decrepitude, dissolution and new birth; in one or other of which
stages we may, in all times, and all places where men inhabit, discern it; and
do ourselves, in this time and place, whether as cooperating or as contending,
as healthy members or as diseased ones, to our joy and sorrow, form part of
it. The question, What is the actual condition of Society? has in these days
unhappily become important enough. No one of us is unconcerned in that
question; but for the majority of thinking men a true answer to it, such is the
state of matters, appears almost as the one thing needful. Meanwhile, as the
true answer, that is to say, the complete and fundamental answer and
settlement, often as it has been demanded, is nowhere forthcoming, and
indeed by its nature is impossible, any honest approximation towards such is
not without value. The feeblest light, or even so much as a more precise
recognition of the darkness, which is the first step to attainment of light, will be
welcome.
This once understood, let it not seem idle if we remark that here too our old
Aphorism holds; that again in the Body Politic, as in the animal body, the sign
of right performances in Unconsciousness. Such indeed is virtually the
meaning of that phrase, 'artificial state of society,; as contrasted with the
natural state, and indicating something so inferior to it. For, in all vital things,
men distinguish an Artificial and a Natural; founding on some dim perception
or sentiment of the very truth we here insist on: the artificial is the conscious,
mechanical; the natural is the unconscious, dynamical. Thus, as we have an
artificial Poetry, and prize only the natural; so likewise we have an artificial
Morality, an artificial Wisdom, an artificial Society. The artificial Society is
precisely one that knows its own structure, its own internal functions; not in
watching, not in knowing which, but in working outwardly to the fulfilment of
its aim, does the wellbeing of a Society consist. Every Society, every Polity,
has a spiritual principle; is the embodiment, tentative and more or less
complete, of an Idea: all its tendencies of endeavour, specialties of custom, its
laws, politics and whole procedure (as the glance of some Montesquieu,
across innumerable superficial entanglements, can partly decipher), are
prescribed by an Idea, and flow naturally from it, as movements from the
living source of motion. This Idea, be it of devotion to a man or class of men,
to a creed, to an institution, or even, as in more ancient times, to a piece of
land, is ever a true Loyalty; has in it something of a religious, paramount, quite
infinite character; it is properly the Soul of the State, its Life; mysterious as
other forms of Life, and like these working secretly, and in a depth beyond
that of consciousness.
Accordingly, it is not in the vigorous ages of a Roman Republic that Treatises
of the Commonwealth are written: while the Decii are rushing with devoted
bodies on the enemies of Rome, what need of preaching Patriotism? The
virtue of Patriotism has already sunk from its pristine all-transcendent
condition, before it has received a name. So long as the Commonwealth
continues rightly athletic, it cares not to dabble in anatomy. Why teach
obedience to the Sovereign; why so much as admire it, or separately
recognise it, while a divine idea of Obedience perennially inspires all men?
Loyalty, like Patriotism, of which it is a form, was not praised till it had begun
to decline; the Preux Chevaliers first became rightly admirable, when 'dying
for their king' had ceased to be a habit with chevaliers. For if the mystic
significance of the State, let this be what it may, dwells vitally in every heart,
encircles every life as with a second higher life, how should it stand
self-questioning? It must rush outward, and express itself by works. Besides,
if perfect, it is there as by necessity, and does not excite inquiry: it is also by
nature infinite, has no limits; therefore can be circumscribed by no conditions
and definitions; cannot be reasoned of; except musically, or in the language of
Poetry, cannot yet so much as be spoken of.
In those days, Society was what we name healthy, sound at heart. Not indeed
without suffering enough; not without perplexities, difficulty on every side: for
such is the appointment of man; his highest and sole blessedness is, that he
toil, and know what to toil at; not in ease, but in united victorious labour,
which is at once evil and the victory over evil, does his Freedom lie. Nay,
often, looking no deeper than such superficial perplexities of the early Time,
historians have taught us that it was all one mass of contradiction and disease;
and in the antique Republic or feudal Monarchy have seen only the confused
chaotic quarry, not the robust labourer, or the stately edifice he was building
of it.
If Society, in such ages, had its difficulty, it had also its strength; if sorrowful
masses of rubbish so encumbered it, the tough sinews to hurl them aside, with
indomitable heart, were not wanting. Society went along without complaint;
did not stop to scrutinize itself, to say, How well I perform! or, Alas, how ill!
Men did not yet feel themselves to be 'the envy of surrounding nations'; and
were enviable on that very account. Society was what we can call whole, in
both senses of the word. The individual man was in himself a whole, or
complete union; and could combine with his fellows as the living member of a
greater whole. For all men, through their life, were animated by one great
Idea; thus all efforts pointed one way, everywhere there was wholeness.
Opinion and Action had not yet become disunited; but the former could still
produce the latter, or attempt to produce it; as the stamp does its impression
while the wax is not hardened. Thought and the voice of thought were also a
unison; thus, instead of Speculation, we had Poetry; Literature, in its rude
utterance, was as yet a heroic Song, perhaps too a devotional Anthem.
Religion was everywhere; Philosophy lay hid under it, peaceably included in it.
Herein, as in the life-centre of all, lay the true health and oneness. Only at a
later era must Religion split itself into Philosophies; and thereby, the vital union
of Thought being lost, disunion and mutual collision in all provinces of Speech
and Action more and more prevail. For if the Poet, or Priest, or by whatever
title the inspired thinker may be named, is the sign of vigour and well-being; so
likewise is the Logician, or uninspired thinker, the sign of disease, probably of
decrepitude and decay. Thus, not to mention other instances, one of them
much nearer hand, - so soon as Prophecy among the Hebrews had ceased,
then did the reign of Argumentation begin; and the ancient Theocracy, in its
Sadduceeisms and Phariseeisms, and vain jangling of sects and doctors, give
token that the soul of it had fled, and that the body itself, by natural
dissolution, 'with the old forces still at work, but working in reverse order,'
was on the road to final disappearance.
III.
We might pursue this question into innumerable other ramifications; and
everywhere, under new shapes, find the same truth, which we here so
imperfectly enunciate, disclosed; that throughout the whole world of man, in
all manifestations and performances of his nature, outward and inward,
personal and social, the Perfect, the Great is a mystery to itself, knows not
itself; whatsoever does know itself is already little, and more or less imperfect.
Or otherwise, we may say, Unconsciousness belongs to pure unmixed life;
Consciousness to a diseased mixture and conflict of life and death:
Unconsciousness is the sign of creation; Consciousness, at best, that of
manufacture. So deep, in this existence of ours, is the significance of Mystery.
Well might the Ancients make Silence a god; for it is the element of all
godhood, infinitude, or transcendental greatness; at once the source and the
ocean wherein all such begins and ends. In the same sense, too, have Poets
sung 'Hymns to the Night'; as if Night were nobler than Day; as if Day were
but a small motley-coloured veil spread transiently over the infinite bosom of
Night, and did but deform and hide from us its purely transparent eternal
deeps. So likewise have they spoken and sung as if Silence were the grand
epitome and complete sum-total of all Harmony; and Death, what mortals call
Death, properly the beginning of Life. Under such figures, since except in
figures there is no speaking of the Invisible, have men endeavoured to express
a great Truth; - a Truth, in our Times, as nearly as is perhaps possible,
forgotten by the most; which nevertheless continues forever true, forever
all-important, and will one day, under new figures, be again brought home to
the bosoms of all.
But indeed, in a far lower sense, the rudest mind has still some intimation of
the greatness there is in Mystery. If Silence was made a god of by the
Ancients, he still continues a government-clerk among us Moderns. To all
quacks, moreover, of what sort soever, the effect of Mystery is well known:
here and there some Cagliostro, even in latter days, turns it to notable
account: the blockhead also, who is ambitious, and has no talent, finds
sometimes in 'the talent of silence,' a kind of succedaneum. Or again, looking
on the opposite side of the matter, do we not see, in the common
understanding of mankind, a certain distrust, a certain contempt of what is
altogether self conscious and mechanical? As nothing that is wholly seen
through has other than a trivial character; so anything professing to be great,
and yet wholly to see through itself, is already known to be false, and a failure.
The evil repute your 'theoretical men' stand in, the acknowledged inefficiency
of 'paper constitutions,' and all that class of objects, are instances of this.
Experience often repeated, and perhaps a certain instinct of something far
deeper that lies under such experiences, has taught men so much. They know
beforehand, that the loud is generally the insignificant, the empty. Whatsoever
can proclaim itself from the house-tops may be fit for the hawker, and for
those multitudes that must needs buy of him; but for any deeper use, might as
well continue unproclaimed. Observe too, how the converse of the
proposition holds; how the insignificant, the empty, is usually the loud; and,
after the manner of a drum, is loud even because of its emptiness. The uses of
some Patent Dinner Calefactor can be bruited abroad over the whole world in
the course of the first winter; those of the Printing Press are not so well seen
into for the first three centuries: the passing of the Select-Vestries Bill raises
more noise and hopeful expectancy among mankind than did the promulgation
of the Christian Religion. Again, and again, we say, the great, the creative and
enduring is ever a secret to itself; only the small, the barren and transient is
otherwise.
IV.
If we now, with a practical medical view, examine, by this same test of
Unconsciousness, the Condition of our own Era, and of man's Life therein, the
diagnosis we arrive at is nowise of a flattering sort. The state of Society in our
days is, of all possible states, the least an unconscious one: this is specially the
Era when all manner of Inquiries into what was once the unfelt, involuntary
sphere of man's existence, find their place, and, as it were, occupy the whole
domain of thought. What, for example, is all this that we hear, for the last
generation or two, about the Improvement of the Age, the Spirit of the Age,
Destruction of Prejudice, Progress of the Species, and the March of Intellect,
but an unhealthy state of self-sentence, self-survey; the precursor and
prognostic of still worse health? That Intellect do march, if possible at
double-quick time, is very desirable; nevertheless, why should she turn round
at every stride, and cry: See you what a stride I have taken! Such a marching
of Intellect is distinctly of the spavined kind; what the Jockeys call 'all action
and no go.' Or at best, if we examine well, it is the marching of that gouty
Patient, whom his Doctors had clapt on a metal floor artificially heated to the
searing point, so that he was obliged to march, and did march with a
vengeance - nowhither. Intellect did not awaken for the first time yesterday;
but has been under way from Noah's Flood downwards: greatly her best
progress, moreover, was in the old times, when she said nothing about it. In
those same 'dark ages,' Intellect (metaphorically as well as literally) could
invent glass, which now she has enough ado to grind into spectacles. Intellect
built not only Churches, but a Church, the Church, based on this firm Earth,
yet reaching up, and leading up, as high as Heaven; and now it is all she can
do to keep its doors bolted, that there be no tearing of the Surplices, no
robbery of the Alms-box. She built a Senate-house likewise, glorious in its
kind; and now it costs her a well-nigh mortal effort to sweep it clear of
vermin, and get the roof made rain-tight.
But the truth is, with Intellect, as with most other things, we are now passing
from that first or boastful stage of Self-sentience into the second or painful
one: out of these often-asseverated declarations that 'our system is in high
order,' we come now, by natural sequence, to the melancholy conviction that
it is altogether the reverse. Thus, for instance, in the matter of Government,
the period of the 'Invaluable Constitution' has to be followed by a Reform Bill;
to laudatory De Lolmes succeed objurgatory Benthams. At any rate, what
Treatises on the Social Contract, on the Elective Franchise, the Rights of
Man, the Rights of Property, Codifications, Institutions, Constitutions, have
we not, for long years, groaned under! Or again, with a wider survey,
consider those Essays on Man, Thoughts on Man, Inquiries concerning Man;
not to mention Evidences of the Christian Faith, Theories of Poetry,
Considerations on the Origin of Evil, which during the last century have
accumulated on us to a frightful extent. Never since the beginning of Time was
there, that we hear or read of, so intensely self-conscious a Society. Our
whole relations to the Universe and to our fellow-man have become an
Inquiry, a Doubt; nothing will go on of its own accord, and do its function
quietly; but all things must be probed into, the whole working of man's world
be anatomically studied. Alas, anatomically studied, that it may be medically
studied, that it may be medically aided! Till at length indeed, we have come to
such a pass, that except in this same medicine, with its artifices and
appliances, few can so much as imagine any strength or hope to remain for us.
The whole Life of Society must now be carried on by drugs: doctor after
doctor appears with his nostrum, of Cooperative Societies, Universal
Suffrage, Cottage-and-Cow systems, Repression of Population, Vote by
ballot. To such height has the dyspepsia of Society reached: as indeed the
constant grinding internal pain, or from time to time the mad spasmodic
throes, of all Society do otherwise too mournfully indicate.
Far be it from us to attribute, as some unwise persons do, the disease itself to
this unhappy sensation that there is a disease! The Encyclopedists did not
produce the troubles of France; but the troubles of France produced the
Encyclopedists, and much else. The Self-consciousness is the symptom
merely; nay, it is also the attempt towards cure. We record the fact, without
special censure; not wondering that Society should feel itself, and in all ways
complain of aches and twinges, for it has suffered enough. Napoleon was but
a Job's-comforter, when he told his wounded staff-officer, twice unhorsed by
cannon-balls, and with half his limbs blown to pieces: "Vous vous écoutez
trop!"
On the outward, as it were Physical diseases of Society, it were beside our
purpose to insist here. These are diseases which he who runs may read; and
sorrow over, with or without hope. Wealth has accumulated itself into masses;
and Poverty, also id accumulation enough, lies impassably separated from it;
opposed, uncommunicating, like forces in positive and negative poles. The
gods of this lower world sit aloft on glittering thrones, less happy than
Epicurus' gods, but as indolent, as impotent; while the boundless living chaos
of Ignorance and Hunger welters terrific, in its dark fury, under their feet.
How much among us might be likened to a whited sepulchre; outwardly all
pomp and strength; but inwardly full of horror and despair and dead-men's
bones! Iron highways, with their wains fire-winged, are uniting all ends of the
firm Land; quays and moles, with their innumerable stately fleets, tame the
Ocean into our pliant bearer of burdens; Labour's thousand arms of sinew
and of metal, all-conquering everywhere, from the tops of the mountain down
to the depths of the mine and the caverns of the sea, ply unweariedly for the
service of man: yet man remains unserved. He has subdued this Planet, his
habitation and inheritance; yet reaps no profit from the victory.
Sad to look upon: in the highest stage of civilisation, nine-tenths of mankind
have to struggle in the lowest battle of savage or even animal man, the battle
against Famine. Countries are rich, prosperous in all manner of increase,
beyond example: but the Men of those countries are poor, needier than ever
of all sustenance outward and inward; of Belief, of Knowledge, of Money, of
Food. The rule, Sic vos non vobis, never altogether to be got rid of in men's
Industry, now presses with such incubus weight, that Industry must shake it
off, or utterly be strangled under it; and, alas, can as yet but gasp and rave,
and aimlessly struggle, like one in the final deliration. Thus Change, or the
inevitable approach of Change, is manifest everywhere. In one Country we
have seen lava-torrents of fever-frenzy envelop all things; Government
succeed Government, like the phantasms of a dying brain. In another Country,
we can even now see, in maddest alternation, the Peasant governed by such
guidance as this: To labour earnestly one month in raising wheat, and the next
month labour earnestly in burning it. So that Society, were it not by nature
immortal, and its death ever a new-birth, might appear, as it does in the eyes of
some, to be sick to dissolution, and even now writhing in its last agony. Sick
enough we must admit it to be, with disease enough, a whole nosology of
diseases; wherein he perhaps is happiest that is not called to prescribe as
physician; - wherein, however, one small piece of policy, that of summoning
the Wisest in the Commonwealth, by the sole method yet known or thought
of, to come together and with their whole soul consult for it, might, but for late
tedious experiences, have seemed unquestionable enough.
But leaving this, let us rather look within, into the Spiritual condition of
Society, and see what aspects and prospects offer themselves there. For after
all, it is there properly that the secret and origin of the whole is to be sought:
the Physical derangements of Society are but the image and impress of its
Spiritual; while the heart continues sound, all other sickness is superficial, and
temporary. False Action is the fruit of false Speculation; let the spirit of
Society be free and strong, that is to say, let true Principles inspire the
members of Society, then neither can disorders accumulate in its Practice;
each disorder will be promptly, faithfully inquired into, and remedied as it
arises. But alas, with us the Spiritual condition of Society is no less sickly than
the Physical. Examine man's internal world, in any of its social relations and
performances, here too all seems diseased self-consciousness, collision and
mutually-destructive struggle. Nothing acts from within outwards in undivided
healthy force; everything lies impotent, lamed, its force turned inwards, and
painfully 'listens to itself.'
To begin with our highest Spiritual function, with Religion, we might ask,
Whither has Religion now fled? Of Churches and their establishments we here
say nothing; nor of the unhappy domains of Unbelief, and how innumerable
men, blinded in their minds, have grown to 'live without God in the world';
but, taking the fairest side of the matter, we ask, What is the nature of that
same Religion, which still lingers in the hearts of the few who are called, and
call themselves, specially the Religious? Is it a healthy religion, vital,
unconscious of itself; that shines forth spontaneously in doing of the Work, or
even in preaching of the Word? Unhappily, no. Instead of heroic martyr
Conduct, and inspired and soul-inspiring Eloquence, whereby Religion itself
were brought home to our living bosoms, to live and reign there, we have
'Discourses on the Evidences,' endeavouring, with smallest result, to make it
probable that such a thing as Religion exists. The most enthusiastic
Evangelicals do not preach a Gospel, but keep describing how it should and
might be preached: to awaken the sacred fire of faith, as by a sacred
contagion, is not their endeavour; but, at most, to describe how Faith shows
and acts, and scientifically distinguish true Faith from false. Religion, like all
else, is conscious of itself, listens to itself; it becomes less and less creative,
vital; more and more mechanical. Considered as a whole, the Christian
Religion of late ages has been continually dissipating itself into Metaphysics;
and threatens now to disappear, as some rivers do, in deserts of barren sand.
Of Literature, and its deep-seated, wide-spread maladies, why speak?
Literature is but a branch of Religion, and always participates in its character:
however, in our time, it is the only branch that still shows any greenness; and,
as some think, must one day become the main stem. Now, apart from the
subterranean and tartarean regions of Literature; - leaving out of view the
frightful, scandalous statistics of Puffing, the mystery of Slander, Falsehood,
Hatred and other convulsion-work of rabid Imbecility, and all that has
rendered Literature on that side a perfect 'Babylon the mother of
Abominations,' in very deed making the world 'drunk' with the wine of her
iniquity; - forgetting all this, let us look only to the regions of the upper air; to
such Literature as can be said to have some attempt towards truth in it, some
tone of music, and if it be not poetical, to hold of the poetical. Among other
characteristics, is not this manifest enough: that it knows itself? Spontaneous
devotedness to the object, being wholly possessed by the object, what we
can call Inspiration, has well-nigh ceased to appear in Literature. Which
melodious Singer forgets that he is singing melodiously?
We have not the love of greatness, but the love of the love of greatness.
Hence infinite Affectations, Distractions; in every case inevitable Error.
Consider, for one example, this peculiarity of Modern Literature, the sin that
has been named View-hunting. In our elder writers, there are no paintings of
scenery for its own sake; no euphuistic gallantries with Nature, but a constant
heartlove for her, a constant dwelling in communion with her. View-hunting,
with so much else that is of kin to it, first came decisively into action through
the Sorrows of Werter; which wonderful Performance, indeed, may in many
senses be regarded as the progenitor of all that has since become popular in
Literature; whereof, in so far as concerns spirit and tendency, it still offers the
most instructive image; for nowhere, except in its own country, above all in
the mind of its illustrious Author, has it yet fallen wholly obsolete. Scarcely
ever, till that late epoch, did any worshipper of Nature become entirely aware
that he was worshipping, much to his own credit; and think of saying to
himself: Come, let us make a description! Intolerable enough: when every
puny whipster plucks out his pencil, and insists on painting you a scene; so
that the instant you discern such a thing as 'wavy outline,' 'mirror of the lake,'
'stern headland,' or the like, in any Book, you tremulously hasten on; and
scarcely the Author of Waverley himself can tempt you not to skip.
Nay, is not the diseased self-conscious state of Literature disclosed in this one
fact, which lies so near us here, the prevalence of Reviewing! Sterne's wish
for a reader 'that would give-up the reins of his imagination into his author's
hands, and be pleased he knew not why, and cared not wherefore,' might
lead him a long journey now. Indeed, for our best class of readers, the chief
pleasure, a very stinted one, is this same knowing of the Why; which many a
Kames and Bossu has been, ineffectually enough, endeavouring to teach us:
till at last these also have laid down their trade; and now your Reviewer is a
mere taster; who tastes, and says, by the evidence of such palate, such
tongue, as he has got, It is good, It is bad. Was it thus that the French carried
out certain inferior creatures on their Algerine Expedition, to taste the wells for
them, and try whether they were poisoned? Far be it from us to disparage our
own craft, whereby we have our living! Only we must note these things: that
Reviewing spreads with strange vigour; that such a man as Byron reckons the
Reviewer and the Poet equal; that at the last Leipzig Fair, there was
advertised a Review of Reviews. By and by it will be found that all Literature
has become one boundless self-devouring Review; and, as in London routs,
we have to do nothing, but only to see others do nothing. - Thus does
Literature also, like a sick thing, superabundantly 'listen to itself.'
No less is this unhealthy symptom manifest, if we cast a glance on our
Philosophy, on the character of our speculative Thinking. Nay, already, as
above hinted, the mere existence and necessity of a Philosophy is an evil. Man
is sent hither not to question, but to work: 'the end of man,' it was long ago
written, 'is an Action, not a Thought.' In the perfect state, all Thought were but
the picture and inspiring symbol of Action; Philosophy, except as Poetry and
Religion, would have no being. And yet how, in this imperfect state, can it be
avoided, can it be dispensed with? Man stands as in the centre of Nature; his
fraction of Time encircled by Eternity, his handbreadth of Space encircled by
Infinitude: how shall he forbear asking himself, What am I; and Whence; and
Whither? How too, except in slight partial hints, in kind asseverations and
assurances, such as a mother quiets her fretfully inquisitive child with, shall he
get answer to such inquiries?
The disease of Metaphysics, accordingly, is a perennial one. In all ages, those
questions of Death and Immortality, Origin of Evil, Freedom and Necessity,
must, under new forms, anew make their appearance; ever, from time to time,
must the attempt to shape for ourselves some Theorem of the Universe be
repeated. And ever unsuccessfully: for what Theorem of the Infinite can the
Finite render complete? We, the whole species of Mankind, and our whole
existence and history, are but a floating speck in the illimitable ocean of the
All; yet in that ocean; indissoluble portion thereof; partaking of its infinite
tendencies: borne this way and that by its deep-swelling tides, and grand
ocean currents; - of which what faintest chance is there that we should ever
exhaust the significance, ascertain the goings and comings? A region of Doubt,
therefore, hovers forever in the background; in Action alone can we have
certainty. Nay, properly Doubt is the indispensable, inexhaustible material
whereon Action works, which Action has to fashion into Certainty and
Reality; only on a canvas of Darkness, such is man's way of being, could the
many-coloured picture of our Life paint itself and shine.
Thus if our eldest system of Metaphysics is as old as the Book of Genesis,
our latest is that of Mr. Thomas Hope, published only within the current year.
It is a chronic malady that of Metaphysics, as we said, and perpetually recurs
on us. At the utmost, there is a better and a worse in it; a stage of
convalescence, and a stage of relapse with new sickness: these forever
succeed each other, as is the nature of all Life-movement here below. The
first, or convalescent stage, we might also name that of Dogmatical or
Constructive Metaphysics; when the mind constructively endeavours to
scheme out and assert for itself an actual Theorem of the Universe, and
therewith for a time rests satisfied. The second or sick stage might be called
that of Sceptical or Inquisitory Metaphysics; when the mind having widened
its sphere of vision, the existing Theorem of the Universe no longer answers
the phenomena, no longer yields contentment; but must be torn in pieces, and
certainty anew sought for in the endless realms of denial. All Theologies and
sacred Cosmogonies belong, in some measure, to the first class; in all
Pyrrhonism, from Pyrrho down to Hume and the innumerable disciples of
Hume, we have instances enough of the second. In the former, so far as it
affords satisfaction, a temporary anodyne to doubt, an arena for wholesome
action, there may be much good; indeed in this case, it holds rather of Poetry
than of Metaphysics, might be called Inspiration rather than Speculation. The
latter is Metaphysics proper; a pure, unmixed, though from time to time a
necessary evil.
For truly, if we look into it, there is no more fruitless endeavour than this
same, which the Metaphysician proper toils in: to educe Conviction out of
Negation. How, by merely testing and rejecting what is not, shall we ever
attain knowledge of what is? Metaphysical Speculation, as it begins in No or
Nothingness, so it must needs end in Nothingness; circulates and must
circulate in endless vortices; creating, swallowing - itself. Our being is made
up of Light and Darkness, the Light resting on the Darkness, and balancing it;
everywhere there is Dualism, Equipoise; a perpetual Contradiction dwells in
us: 'where shall I place myself to escape from my own shadow?' Consider it
well, Metaphysics is the attempt of the mind to rise above the mind; to environ
and shut in, or as we say, comprehend the mind. Hopeless struggle, for the
wisest, as for the foolishest! What strength of sinew, or athletic skill, will
enable the stoutest athlete to fold his own body in his arms, and, by lifting, lift
up himself? The Irish Saint swam the Channel, 'carrying his head in his teeth';
but the feat has never been imitated.
That this is the age of Metaphysics, in the proper, or sceptical Inquisitory
sense; that there was a necessity for its being such an age, we regard as our
indubitable misfortune. From many causes, the arena of free Activity has long
been narrowing, that of sceptical Inquiry becoming more and more universal,
more and more perplexing. The Thought conducts not to the Deed; but in
boundless chaos, self-devouring, engenders monstrosities, phantasms,
fire-breathing chimeras. Profitable Speculation were this: What is to be done;
and How is it to be done? But with us not so much as the What can be got
sight of. For some generations, all Philosophy has been a painful, captious,
hostile question towards everything in the Heaven above, and in the Earth
beneath: Why art thou there? Till at length it has come to pass that the worth
and authenticity of all things seem dubitable or deniable: our best effort must
be unproductively spent not in working, but in ascertaining our mere
Whereabout, and so much as whether we are to work at all. Doubt, which, as
was said, ever hangs in the background of our world, has now become our
middleground and foreground; whereon, for the time, no fair Life-picture can
be painted, but only the dark air-canvas itself flow round us, bewildering and
benighting.
Nevertheless, doubt as we will, man is actually Here; not to ask questions, but
to do work: in this time, as in all times, it must be the heaviest evil for him, if
his faculty of Action lie dormant, and only that of sceptical Inquiry exert itself.
Accordingly whoever looks abroad upon the world, comparing the Past with
the Present, may find that the practical condition of man in these days is one
of the saddest; burdened with miseries which are in a considerable degree
peculiar. In no time was man's life what he calls a happy one; in no time can it
be so. A perpetual dream there has been of Paradises, and some luxurious
Lubberland, where the brooks should run wine, and the trees bend with
ready-baked viands; but it was a dream merely; an impossible dream.
Suffering, contradiction, error, have their quite perennial, and even
indispensable abode in this Earth. Is not labour the inheritance of man? And
what labour for the present is joyous, and not grievous? Labour, effort, is the
very interruption of that ease, which man foolishly enough fancies to be his
happiness; and yet without labour there were no ease, no rest, so much as
conceivable. Thus Evil, what we call Evil, must ever exist while man exists:
Evil, in the widest sense we can give it, is precisely the dark, disordered
material out of which man's Freewill has to create an edifice of order and
Good. Ever must Pain urge us to Labour; and only in free Effort can any
blessedness be imagined for us.
But if man has, in all ages, had enough to encounter, there has, in most
civilised ages, been an inward force vouchsafed him, whereby the pressure of
things outward might be withstood. Obstruction abounded; but Faith also was
not wanting. It is by Faith that man removes mountains: while he had Faith, his
limbs might be wearied with toiling, his back galled with bearing; but the heart
within him was peaceable and resolved. In the thickest gloom there burnt a
lamp to guide him. If he struggled and suffered, he felt that it even should be
so; knew for what he was suffering and struggling. Faith gave him an inward
Willingness; a world of Strength wherewith to front a world of Difficulty. The
true wretchedness lies here: that the Difficulty remain and the Strength be lost;
that Pain cannot relieve itself in free Effort; that we have the Labour, and want
the Willingness. Faith strengthens us, enlightens us, for all endeavours and
endurances; with Faith we can do all, and dare all, and life itself has a
thousand times been joyfully given away. But the sum of man's misery is even
this, that he feel himself crushed under the Juggernaut wheels, and know that
Juggernaut is no divinity, but a dead mechanical idol.
Now this is specially the misery which has fallen on man in our Era. Belief,
Faith has well-nigh vanished from the world. The youth on awakening in this
wondrous Universe no longer finds a competent theory of its wonders. Time
was, when if he asked himself, What is man, What are the duties of man? the
answer stood ready written for him. But now the ancient 'ground-plan of the
All' belies itself when brought into contact with reality; Mother Church has, to
the most, become a superannuated Step-mother, whose lessons go
disregarded; or are spurned at, and scornfully gainsaid. For young Valour and
thirst of Action no ideal Chivalry invites to heroism, prescribes what is heroic:
the old ideal of Manhood has grown obsolete, and the new is still invisible to
us, and we grope after it in darkness, one clutching this phantom, another that;
Werterism, Byronism, even Brummelism, each has its day. For Contemplation
and love of Wisdom, no Cloister now opens its religious shades; the Thinker
must, in all senses, wander homeless, too often aimless, looking up to a
Heaven which is dead for him, round to an Earth which is deaf. Action, in
those old days, was easy, was voluntary, for the divine worth of human things
lay acknowledged; Speculation was wholesome, for it ranged itself as the
handmaid of Action; what could not so range itself died out by its natural
death, by neglect. Loyalty still hallowed obedience, and made rule noble;
there was still something to be loyal to: the Godlike stood embodied under
many a symbol in men's interests and business; the Finite shadowed forth the
Infinite; Eternity looked through Time. The Life of man was encompassed and
overcanopied by a glory of Heaven, even as his dwelling-place by the azure
vault.
How changed in these new days! Truly may it be said, the Divinity has
withdrawn from the Earth; or veils himself in that wide-wasting Whirlwind of a
departing Era, wherein the fewest can discern his goings. Not Godhead, but
an iron, ignoble circle of Necessity embraces all things; binds the youth of
these times into a sluggish thrall, or else exasperates him into a rebel. Heroic
Action is paralysed; for what worth now remains unquestionable with him?
Aye the fervid period when his whole nature cries aloud for Action, there is
nothing sacred under whose banner he can act; the course and kind and
conditions of free Action are all but undiscoverable. Doubt storms-in on him
through every avenue; inquiries of the deepest, painfulest sort must be
engaged with; and the invincible energy of young years waste itself in
sceptical, suicidal cavillings; in passionate 'questionings of Destiny,' whereto
no answer will be returned.
For men, in whom the old perennial principle of Hunger (be it Hunger of the
poor Day-drudge who stills it with eighteenpence a-day, or of the ambitious
Placehunter who can nowise still it with so little) suffices to fill-up existence,
the case is bad; but not the worst. These men have an aim, such as it is; and
can steer towards it, with chagrin enough truly; yet, as their hands are kept
full, without desperation. Unhappier are they to whom a higher instinct has
been given; who struggle to be persons, not machines; to whom the Universe
is not a warehouse, or at best a fancy-bazaar, but a mystic temple and hall of
doom. For such men there lie properly two courses open. The lower, yet still
an estimable class, take up with worn-out Symbols of the Godlike; keep
trimming and trucking between these and Hypocrisy, purblindly enough,
miserably enough. A numerous intermediate class end in Denial; and form a
theory that there is no theory; that nothing is certain in the world, except this
fact of Pleasure being pleasant; so they try to realise what trifling modicum of
Pleasure they can come at, and to live contented therewith, winking hard. Of
those we speak not here; but only of the second nobler class, who also have
dared to say No, and cannot yet say Yea; but feel that in the No they dwell as
in a Golgotha, where life enters not, where peace is not appointed them.
Hard, for most part, is the fate of such men; the harder the nobler they are. In
dim forecastings, wrestles within them the 'Divine Idea of the World,' yet will
nowhere visibly reveal itself. They have to realise a Worship for themselves,
or live unworshipping. The God-like has vanished from the world; and they,
by the strong cry of their soul's agony, like true wonder-workers, must again
evoke its presence. This miracle is their appointed task; which they must
accomplish, or die wretchedly: this miracle has been accomplished by such;
but not in our land; our land yet knows not of it. Behold a Byron, in melodious
tones, 'cursing his day': he mistakes earthborn passionate desire for
heaven-inspired Freewill; without heavenly loadstar, rushes madly into the
dance of meteoric lights that hover on the mad Mahlstrom; and goes down
among its eddies. Hear a Shelley filling the earth with inarticulate wail; like the
infinite, inarticulate grief and weeping of forsaken infants. A noble Friedrich
Schlegel, stupefied in that fearful loneliness, as of a silenced battlefield, flies
back to Catholicism; as a child might to its slain mother's bosom, and cling
there. In lower regions, how many a poor Hazlitt must wander on God's
verdant earth, like the Unblest on burning deserts; passionately dig wells, and
draw up only the dry quicksand; believe that he is seeking Truth, yet only
wrestle among endless Sophisms, doing desperate battle as with
spectre-hosts; and die and make no sign!
To the better order of such minds any mad joy of Denial has long since
ceased: the problem is not now to deny, but to ascertain and perform. Once
in destroying the False, there was a certain inspiration; but now the genius of
Destruction has done its work, there is now nothing more to destroy. The
doom of the Old has long been pronounced, and irrevocable; the Old has
passed away: but, alas, the New appears not in its stead; the Time is still in
pangs of travail with the New. Man has walked by the light of conflagrations,
and amid the sound of falling cities; and now there is darkness, and long
watching till it be morning. The voice even of the faithful can but exclaim: 'As
yet struggles the twelfth hour of the Night: birds of darkness are on the wing,
spectres uproar, the dead walk, the living dream. - Thou, Eternal Providence,
wilt cause the day to dawn!'[2]
Such being the condition, temporal and spiritual, of the world at our Epoch,
can we wonder that the world 'listens to itself,' and struggles and writhes,
everywhere externally and internally, like a thing in pain? Nay, is not even this
unhealthy action of the world's Organisation, if the symptom of universal
disease, yet also the symptom and sole means of restoration and cure? The
effort of Nature, exerting her medicative force to cast-out foreign
impediments, and once more become One, become whole? In Practice, still
more in Opinion, which is the precursor and prototype of Practice, there must
needs be collision, convulsion; much has to be ground away. Thought must
needs be Doubt and Inquiry, before it can again be Affirmation and Sacred
Precept. Innumerable 'Philosophies of Man,' contending in boundless hubbub,
must annihilate each other, before an inspired Poesy and Faith for Man can
fashion itself together.
V.
From this stunning hubbub, a true Babel-like confusion of tongues, we have
here selected two Voices; less as objects of praise or condemnation, than as
signs how far the confusion has reached, what prospect there is of its abating.
Friedrich Schlegel's Lectures delivered at Dresden, and Mr. Hope's Essay
published in London, are the latest utterances of European Speculation: far
asunder in external place, they stand at a still wider distance in inward
purport; are, indeed, so opposite and yet so cognate that they may, in many
senses, represent the two Extremes of our whole modern system of Thought;
and be said to include between them all the Metaphysical Philosophies, so
often alluded to here, which, of late times, from France, Germany, England,
have agitated and almost overwhelmed us. Both in regard to matter and to
form, the relation of these two Works is significant enough.
Speaking first of their cognate qualities, let us remark, not without emotion,
one quite extraneous point of agreement; the fact that the Writers of both have
departed from this world; they have now finished their search, and had all
doubts resolved: while we listen to the voice, the tongue that uttered it has
gone silent forever. But the fundamental, all-pervading similarity lies in this
circumstance, well worthy of being noted, that both these Philosophies are of
the Dogmatic or Constructive sort: each in its way is a kind of Genesis; an
endeavour to bring the Phenomena of man's Universe once more under some
theoretic Scheme: in both there is a decided principle of unity; they strive after
a result which shall be positive; their aim is not to question, but to establish.
This, especially if we consider with what comprehensive concentrated force it
is here exhibited, forms a new feature in such works.
Under all other aspects, there is the most irreconcilable opposition; a staring
contrariety, such as might provoke contrasts, were there far fewer points of
comparison. If Schlegel's Work is the apotheosis of Spiritualism; Hope's again
is the apotheosis of Materialism: in the one, all Matter is evaporated into a
Phenomenon, and terrestrial Life itself, with its whole doings and showings,
held out as a Disturbance (Zerrüttung) produced by the Zeitgeist (Spirit of
Time); in the other, Matter is distilled and sublimated into some semblance of
Divinity: the one regards Space and Time as mere forms of man's mind, and
without external existence or reality; the other supposes Space and Time to
be 'incessantly created,' and rayed-in upon us like a sort of gravitation.' Such
is their difference in respect of purport: no less striking is it in respect of
manner, talent, success and all outward characteristics. Thus, if in Schlegel we
have to admire the power of Words, in Hope we stand astonished, it might
almost be said, at the want of an articulate Language. To Schlegel his
Philosophic Speech is obedient, dexterous, exact, like a promptly ministering
genius; his names are so clear, so precise and vivid, that they almost
(sometimes altogether) become things for him: with Hope there is no
Philosophical Speech; but a painful, confused stammering, and struggling after
such; or the tongue, as in doatish forgetfulness, maunders, low, long-winded,
and speaks not the word intended, but another; so that here the scarcely
intelligible, in these endless convolutions, becomes the wholly unreadable; and
often we could ask, as that mad pupil did of his tutor in Philosophy, "But
whether is Virtue a fluid, then, or a gas?" If the fact, that Schlegel, in the city
of Dresden, could find audience for such high discourse, may excite our envy;
this other fact, that a person of strong powers, skilled in English Thought and
master of its Dialect, could write the Origin and Prospects of Man, may
painfully remind us of the reproach, that England has now no language for
Meditation; that England, the most calculative, is the least meditative, of all
civilised countries.
It is not our purpose to offer any criticism of Schlegel's Book; in such limits as
were possible here, we should despair of communicating even the faintest
image of its significance. To the mass of readers, indeed, both among the
Germans themselves, and still more elsewhere, it nowise addresses itself, and
may lie forever sealed. We point it out as a remarkable document of the Time
and of the Man; can recommend it, moreover, to all earnest Thinkers, as a
work deserving their best regard; a work full of deep meditation, wherein the
infinite mystery of Life, if not represented, is decisively recognised. Of
Schlegel himself, and his character, and spiritual history, we can profess no
thorough or final understanding; yet enough to make us view him with
admiration and pity, nowise with harsh contemptuous censure; and must say,
with clearest persuasion, that the outcry of his being 'a renegade,' and so
forth, is but like other such outcries, a judgment where there was neither jury,
nor evidence, nor judge. The candid reader, in this Book itself, to say nothing
of all the rest, will find traces of a high, far-seeing, earnest spirit, to whom
'Austrian Pensions,' and the Kaiser's crown, and Austria altogether, were but
a light matter to the finding and vitally appropriating of Truth. Let us respect
the sacred mystery of a Person; rush not irreverently into man's Holy of
Holies! Were the lost little one, as we said already, found 'sucking its dead
mother, on the field of carnage,' could it be other than a spectacle for tears? A
solemn mournful feeling comes over us when we see this last Work of
Friedrich Schlegel, the unwearied seeker, end abruptly in the middle; and, as
if he had not yet found, as if emblematically of much, end with an 'Aber-,' with
a 'But-'! This was the last word that came from the Pen of Friedrich Schlegel:
about eleven at night he wrote it down, and there paused sick; at one in the
morning, Time for him had merged itself in Eternity; he was, as we say, no
more.
Still less can we attempt any criticism of Mr. Hope's new Book of Genesis.
Indeed, under any circumstances, criticism of it were now impossible. Such an
utterance could only be responded to in peals of laughter; and laughter sounds
hollow and hideous through the vaults of the dead. Of this monstrous
Anomaly, where all sciences are heaped and huddled together, and the
principles of all are, with a childlike innocence, plied hither and thither, or
wholly abolished in case of need; where the First Cause is figured as a huge
Circle, with nothing to do but radiate 'gravitation' towards its centre; and so
construct a Universe, wherein all, from the lowest cucumber with its coolness,
up to the highest seraph with his love, were but 'gravitation,' direct or reflex,
'in more or less central globes,' - what can we say, except, with sorrow and
shame, that it could have originated nowhere save in England? It is a general
agglomerate of all facts, notions, whims and observations, as they lie in the
brain of an English gentleman; as an English gentleman, of unusual thinking
power, is led to fashion them, in his schools and in his world: all these thrown
into the crucible, and if not fused, yet soldered or conglutinated with
boundless patience; and now tumbled out here, heterogeneous, amorphous,
unspeakable, a world's wonder. Most melancholy must we name the whole
business; full of long-continued thought, earnestness, loftiness of mind; not
without glances into the Deepest, a constant fearless endeavour after truth;
and with all this nothing accomplished, but the perhaps absurdest Book
written in our century by a thinking man. A shameful Abortion; which,
however, need not now be smothered or mangled, for it is already dead; only,
in our love and sorrowing reverence for the writer of Anastasius, and the
heroic seeker of Light, though not bringer thereof, let it be buried and
forgotten.
VI.
For ourselves, the loud discord which jars in these two Works, in innumerable
works of the like import, and generally in all the Thought and Action of this
period, does not any longer utterly confuse us. Unhappy who, in such a time,
felt not, at all conjunctures, ineradicably in his heart the knowledge that a God
made this Universe, and a Demon not! And shall Evil always prosper then?
Out of all Evil comes Good? and no Good that is possible but shall one day
be real. Deep and sad as is our feeling that we stand yet in the bodeful Night;
equally deep, indestructible is our assurance that the Morning also will not fail.
Nay, already, as we look round, streaks of a dayspring are in the east; it is
dawning; when the time shall be fulfilled, it will be day. The progress of man
towards higher and nobler developments of whatever is highest and noblest in
him, lies not only prophesied to Faith, but now written to the eye of
Observation, so that he who runs may read.
One great step of progress, for example, we should say, in actual
circumstances, was this same; the clear ascertainment that we are in progress.
About the grand Course of Providence, and his final Purposes with us, we
can know nothing, or almost nothing: man begins in darkness, ends in
darkness: mystery is everywhere around us and in us, under our feet, among
our hands. Nevertheless so much has become evident to every one, that this
wondrous Mankind is advancing some-whither; that at least all human things
are, have been and forever will be, in Movement and Change; - as, indeed,
for beings that exist in Time, by virtue of Time, and are made of Time, might
have been long since understood. In some provinces, it is true, as in
Experimental Science, this discovery is an old one; but in most others it
belongs wholly to these latter days. How often, in former ages, by eternal
Creeds, eternal Forms of Government and the like, has it been attempted,
fiercely enough, and with destructive violence, to chain the Future under the
Past; and say to the Providence, whose ways with man are mysterious, and
through the great deep: Hitherto shalt thou come, but no farther! A wholly
insane attempt; and for man himself, could it prosper, the frightfulest of all
enchantments, a very Life-in-Death. Man's task here below, the destiny of
every individual man, is to be in turns Apprentice and Workman; or say
rather, Scholar, Teacher, Discoverer: by nature he has a strength for learning,
for imitating; but also a strength for acting, for knowing on his own account.
Are we not in a world seen to be Infinite; the relations lying closest together
modified by those latest discovered and lying farthest asunder? Could you
ever spell-bind man into a Scholar merely, so that he had nothing to discover,
to correct; could you ever establish a Theory of the Universe that were entire,
unimprovable, and which needed only to be got by heart; man then were
spiritually defunct, the Species we now name Man had ceased to exist. But
the gods, kinder to us than we are to ourselves, have forbidden such suicidal
acts. As Phlogiston is displaced by Oxygen, and the Epicycles of Ptolemy by
the Ellipses of Kepler; so does Paganism give place to Catholicism, Tyranny
to Monarchy, and Feudalism to Representative Government, - where also the
process does not stop. Perfection of Practice, like completeness of Opinion,
is always approaching, never arrived; Truth, in the words of Schiller, immer
wird, nie ist; never is, always is a-being.
Sad, truly, were our condition did we know but this, that Change is universal
and inevitable. Launched into a dark shoreless sea of Pyrrhonism, what would
remain for us but to sail aimless, hopeless; or make madly merry, while the
devouring Death had not yet ingulfed us? As indeed, we have seen many, and
still see many do. Nevertheless so stands it not. The venerator of the Past
(and to what pure heart is the Past, in that 'moonlight of memory,' other than
sad and holy?) sorrows not over its departure, as one utterly bereaved. The
true Past departs not, nothing that was worthy in the Past departs; no Truth of
Goodness realised by man ever dies, or can die; but is all still here, and,
recognised or not, lives and works through endless changes. If all things, to
speak in the German dialect, are discerned by us, and exist for us, in an
element of Time, and therefore of Mortality and Mutability; yet Time itself
reposes on Eternity: the truly Great and Transcendental has its basis and
substance in Eternity; stands revealed to us as Eternity in a vesture of Time.
Thus in all Poetry, Worship, Art, Society, as one form passes into another,
nothing is lost; it is but the superficial, as it were the body only, that grows
obsolete and dies; under the mortal body lies a soul which is immortal; which
anew incarnates itself in fairer revelation; and the Present is the living sum-total
of the whole Past.
In Change, therefore, there is nothing terrible, nothing supernatural: on the
contrary, it lies in the very essence of our lot and life in this world. Today is
not yesterday: we ourselves change; how can our Works and Thoughts, if
they are always to be the fittest, continue always the same? Change, indeed, is
painful; yet ever needful; and if Memory have its force and worth, so also has
Hope. Nay, if we look well to it, what is all Derangement, and necessity of
great Change, in itself such an evil, but the product simply of increased
resources which the old methods can no longer administer; of new wealth
which the old coffers will no longer contain? What is it, for example, that in
our own day bursts asunder the bonds of ancient Political Systems, and
perplexes all Europe with the fear of Change, but even this: the increase of
social resources, which the old social methods will no longer sufficiently
administer? The new omnipotence of the Steam-engine is hewing asunder
quite other mountains than the physical. Have not our economical distresses,
those barnyard Conflagrations themselves, the frightfulest madness of our mad
epoch, their rise also in what is a real increase: increase of Men; of human
Force; properly, in such a Planet as ours, the most precious of all increases?
It is true again, the ancient methods of administration will no longer suffice.
Must the indomitable millions, full of old Saxon energy and fire, lie cooped-up
in this Western Nook, choking one another, as in a Blackhole of Calcutta,
while a whole fertile untenanted Earth, desolate for want of the ploughshare,
cries: Come and till me, come and reap me? If the ancient Captains can no
longer yield guidance, new must be sought after: for the difficulty lies not in
nature, but in artifice; the European Calcutta-Blackhole has no walls but air
ones and paper ones. - So too, Scepticism itself, with its innumerable
mischiefs, what is it but the sour fruit of a most blessed increase, that of
Knowledge; a fruit too that will not always continue sour?
In fact, much as we have said and mourned about the unproductive
prevalence of Metaphysics, it was not without some insight into the use that
lies in them. Metaphysical Speculation, if a necessary evil, is the forerunner of
much good. The fever of Scepticism must needs burn itself out, and burn out
thereby the Impurities that caused it; then again will there be clearness, health.
The principle of life, which now struggles painfully, in the outer, thin and
barren domain of the Conscious of Mechanical, may then withdraw into its
inner sanctuaries, its abysses of mystery and miracle; withdraw deeper than
ever into that domain of the Unconscious, by nature infinite and inexhaustible;
and creatively work there. From that mystic region, and from that alone, all
wonders, all Poesies, and Religions, and Social Systems have proceeded: the
like wonders, and greater and higher, lie slumbering there; and, brooded on
by the spirit of the waters, will evolve themselves, and rise like exhalations
from the Deep.
Of our Modern Metaphysics, accordingly, may not this already be said, that if
they have produced no Affirmation, they have destroyed much Negation? It is
a disease expelling a disease: the fire of Doubt, as above hinted, consuming
away the Doubtful; that so the Certain come to light, and again lie visible on
the surface. English or French Metaphysics, in reference to this last stage of
the speculative process, are not what we allude to here; but only the
Metaphysics of the Germans. In France or England, since the days of Diderot
and Hume, though all thought has been of a sceptico-metaphysical texture, so
far as there was any Thought, we have seen no Metaphysics; but only more
or less ineffectual questionings whether such could be. In the Pyrrhonism of
Hume and the Materialism of Diderot, Logic had, as it were, overshot itself,
overset itself. Now, though the athlete, to use our old figure, cannot, by much
lifting, lift up his own body, he may shift it out of a laming posture, and get to
stand in a free one. Such a service have German Metaphysics done for man's
mind. The second sickness of Speculation has abolished both itself and the
first. Friedrich Schlegel complains much of the fruitlessness, the tumult and
transiency of German as of all Metaphysics; and with reason. Yet in that
widespreading, deep-whirling vortex of Kantism, so soon metamorphosed
into Fichteism, Schellingism, and then as Hegelism, and Cousinism, perhaps
finally evaporated, is not this issue visible enough, That Pyrrhonism and
Materialism, themselves necessary phenomena in European culture, have
disappeared; and a Faith in Religion has again become possible and inevitable
for the scientific mind; and the word Free-thinker no longer means the Denier
or Caviller, but the Believer, or the Ready to believe? Nay, in the higher
Literature of Germany, there already lies, for him that can read it, the
beginning of a new revelation of the Godlike; as yet unrecognised by the mass
of the world; but waiting there for recognition, and sure to find it when the fit
hour comes. This age also is not wholly without its Prophets.
Again, under another aspect, if Utilitarianism, or Radicalism, or the
Mechanical Philosophy, or by whatever name it is called, has still its long task
to do; nevertheless we can now see through it and beyond it: in the better
heads, even among us English, it has become obsolete; as in other countries, it
has been, in such heads, for some forty or even fifty years. What sound mind
among the French, for example, now fancies that men can be governed by
'Constitutions'; by the never so cunning mechanising of Self-interests, and all
conceivable adjustments of checking and balancing; in a word, by the best
possible solution of this quite insoluble and impossible problem, Given a world
of Knaves, to produce an Honesty from their united action? Were not
experiments enough of this kind tried before all Europe, and found wanting,
when, in that doomsday of France, the infinite gulf of human Passion shivered
asunder the thin rinds of Habit; and burst forth all-devouring, as in seas of
Nether Fire? Which cunningly-devised 'Constitution,' constitutional,
republican, democratic, sansculottic, could bind that raging chasm together?
Were they not all burnt up, like paper as they were, in its molten eddies; and
still the fire-sea raged fiercer than before? It is not by Mechanism, but by
Religion; not by Self-interest, but by Loyalty, that men are governed or
governable.
Remarkable it is, truly, how everywhere the eternal fact begins again to be
recognised, that there is a Godlike in human affairs; that God not only made
us and beholds us, but is in us and around us; that the Age of Miracles, as it
ever was, now is. Such recognition we discern on all hands and in all
countries: in each country after its own fashion. In France, among the younger
nobler minds, strangely enough; where, in their loud contention with the Actual
and Conscious, the Ideal or Unconscious is, for the time, without exponent;
where Religion means not the parent of Polity, as of all that is highest, but
Polity itself; and this and the other earnest man has not been wanting, who
could audibly whisper to himself: 'Go to, I will make a religion.' In England still
more strangely; as in all things, worthy England will have its way: by the
shrieking of hysterical women, casting out of devils, and other 'gifts of the
Holy Ghost.' Well might Jean Paul say, in this his twelfth hour of the Night,
'the living dream'; well might he say, 'the dead walk.' Meanwhile let us rejoice
rather that so much has been seen into, were it through never so diffracting
media, and never so madly distorted; that in all dialects, though but
half-articulately, this high Gospel begins to be preached: Man is still Man. The
genius of Mechanism, as was once before predicted, will not always sit like a
choking incubus on our soul; but at length, when by a new magic Word the
old spell is broken, become our slave, and as familiar-spirit do all our bidding.
'We are near awakening when we dream that we dream.'
He that has an eye and a heart can even now say: Why should I falter? Light
has come into the world; to such as love Light, so as Light must be loved,
with a boundless all-doing, all-enduring love. For the rest, let that vain struggle
to read the mystery of the Infinite cease to harass us. It is a mystery which,
through all ages, we shall only read here a line of, there another line of. Do we
not already know that the name of the Infinite is Good, is God? Here on Earth
we are Soldiers, fighting in a foreign land; that understand not the plan of the
campaign, and have no need to understand it; seeing well what is at our hand
to be done. Let us do it like Soldiers; with submission, with courage, with a
heroic joy. 'Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with all thy might.'
Behind us, behind each one of us, lie Six Thousand Years of human effort,
human conquest: before us is the boundless Time, with its as yet uncreated
and unconquered Continents and Eldorados, which we, even we, have to
conquer, to create; and from the bosom of Eternity there shine for us celestial
guiding stars.
'My inheritance how wide and fair!
Time is my fair seed-field, of Time I'm
heir.'
______________________________________
Footnotes
1 - Philosophische Vorlesungen insebondere
über Philosophie der Sprache und der Wortes. Geschriben und vorgetragen
zu Dresden im December, 1828, und in den ersten Tagen des Januars,
1829. (Philosophical Lectures, especially on the Philosophy of Language, and the
Gift of Speech. Written and delivered at Dresden in December, 1828 and in
the early days of January, 1829). by Friedrich von Schlegel. 8 vo.
Vienna, 1830. [back]
2 - Jean-Paul's Hesperus (Vorrede). [back]
______________________________________
Top
[The Carlyle-Mill "Negro Question" Debate]
|